Does inspection history predict casualties?
Deficiencies recorded before the year, against casualties in it
| Prior deficiencies | Vessel-years | With a casualty | Rate | Lift |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| None | 62,460 | 17,421 | 27.9% | 1.00 |
| 1 | 15,833 | 4,456 | 28.1% | 1.01 |
| 2-3 | 11,571 | 3,156 | 27.3% | 0.98 |
| 4-9 | 8,344 | 2,266 | 27.2% | 0.98 |
| 10 or more | 3,166 | 875 | 27.6% | 0.99 |
The same method, on a signal that is there
| Prior casualties | Vessel-years | With a casualty | Rate | Lift |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| None | 71,994 | 14,964 | 20.8% | 0.75 |
| One or more | 29,380 | 13,210 | 45.0% | 1.62 |
The biggest caveat
Cohort definition. One row per vessel-year; prior deficiencies counts deficiencies recorded against the hull before that year began, and casualty means the hull appears in a Coast Guard incident investigation for that year.
Citing this
The full method — every limit, how to
check it, and what it does not say
Finding 2: does a change of operator go with a casualty?
Populations: cohorts by type, build decade and length ·
operators of record
This page answers one question for one cohort. The archive can answer the same question for a cohort you choose — a hull type, a build decade, a size band, a district — but that is not built yet, and we are not going to build it on a hunch.
Nothing is for sale here and nothing is charged. If you underwrite, lend against, charter or operate this kind of tonnage and a population view would be useful, leave an email and say so. That is the whole ask.
Used only to answer you. Not shared, not sold, and not added to a mailing list.