CARDIFF is a 2014 freight ship. The Coast Guard has recorded 12 inspections since 2016, most recently in January 2026, along with 1 deficiency and 4 operational controls.
Records from 2016 to 2026. Most recent: inspection, 10 January 2026.
Coast Guard record current through 23 August 2026, retrieved 5 September 2026 from PSIX. Every field on this page was recorded by the Coast Guard. Records for the General Dry Cargo Ship class in Maury's sources begin in 2016.
Every line above is a count of records the US Coast Guard wrote, or a date it recorded.
The counts in the strip above are the same counts; this table splits the inspections by
the kind of activity recorded. A blank resolution means none was recorded in this data; it
does not establish that a deficiency is outstanding. Years with a record are calendar
years in which a record exists, not years in service.
What Maury does not do.
Documentation record
Tonnage as PSIX records it69809 - Convention (Subpart B), Gross Ton 39534 - Convention (Subpart B), Net Ton 80551 - Dead Weight, Metric Ton 103166 - Displacement, Metric Ton
This hull's Official Number is not in the NVDC file dated 10 August 2026 as served by NOAA Fisheries, so no documentation record is shown. Absence from that file is a fact about the file, not about the hull.
Vessel history report
Every record for this hull, in one document — $299
What it gives that this page does not: the whole record in one
dated, citable document — every line with its Coast Guard activity id, the retrieval
date on the cover, built to print to PDF with its page breaks — that a surveyor can
attach and a lender can file. The same facts as this page, complete and in one file.
Every recorded inspection, 2016 to
2026 for this class, in one chronology · every deficiency, with system, dates
and resolution · operational controls imposed and removed · every name this
hull has been recorded under · the vessels it was inspected alongside, and when
· how its record compares with hulls of similar age and size, as a fact about the
population and never a judgement about this vessel.
A request, not a checkout: leave an email and Maury replies once, with
the dated document for this hull and a Stripe invoice for $299. Nothing is charged before
the document is in your hands.
Used only to answer this request.
Not shared, not sold, and not added to a mailing list.
07 - Fire Safety › N/A - No Subsystem › Evaluation of crew performance (fire drills)
Issued 15 October 2018Resolved
07125-Evaluation of crew performance (fire drills)-A ship when in the port of another Contracting Government is subject to control by officers duly authorized by such Government concerning operational requirements in respect of the safety of ships, when there are clear grounds for believing that the master or crew are not familiar with essential shipboard procedures relating to the safety of ships. Vessel crew failed to perform a satisfactory fire drill after given multiple attempts. On the second attempt at the drill, the crew was not familiar with donning the fireman’s outfit and its associated equipment. Fire team failed to use the rigid helmet and the aluminized fire resistant hood—during the drill, fire team utilized the ‘training’ helmet which left the neck and portion of the face exposed, which did not offer similar protection. Vessel was fitted with radios specifically for the fire team, but the fire team failed to bring the radios. Vessel was equipped with lifelines but they were not utilized. Communication of the fire team and team leader was limited to face to face interaction. One of the fire team members had his SCBA face mask worn improperly-- face mask was overly fastened and worn to high on the face such that the nose cap was partially blocking his vision. One of the fire team members was not aware he had a flashlight attached to his fireman’s outfit and was not able to provide to PSCO when requested—he only recognized his flashlight after removing the his jacket. The crew had previously only conducted drills using the firefighting ‘training’ outfits which are not identical to the actual firefighting outfits. The actual firefighting outfits were observed to be in a new condition and found in original packaging. During the drills, the crew confused equipment from the training and actual ensembles. The actual fireman’s outfits were not donned as designed, entirely or properly. In the event of a real fire, PSCO believes the crew would not be prepared to attack or mitigate a fire in a timely manner due to their unfamiliarity with the actual fireman’s outfit and equipment. 74SOLAS(14) XI-1/4.1
Action required: 30 - Ship detained
Due 15 October 2018
Resolved 17 October 2018
Resolution: USCG PSCOs, Flag, Class, Owner's superintendent, and operator's superintendent attended the vessel and witnessed satisfactory fire drill. Flag report provided.
Ownership record
The Coast Guard's documentation record for this hull -- the Abstract of Title,
with its owners and liens as filed -- is not in PSIX. Ask, and Maury buys it from the National
Vessel Documentation Center, files it here with its date, and every reader of this page gets it.