KIRBY 32008B is a 2005 tank barge. The Coast Guard has recorded 33 inspections since 2005, most recently in April 2026, along with 6 deficiencies — 1 with no resolution recorded — and 5 casualty investigations between 2007 and 2023.
Records from 2005 to 2026. Most recent: inspection, 17 April 2026.
Coast Guard record current through 23 August 2026, retrieved 5 September 2026 from PSIX. Every field on this page was recorded by the Coast Guard. Records for the Barge class in Maury's sources begin in 1972.
Every line above is a count of records the US Coast Guard wrote, or a date it recorded.
A blank resolution means none was recorded in this data; it does not establish that a
deficiency is outstanding. Years with a record are calendar years in which a record
exists, not years in service. What Maury does
not do.
DocumentationValid · issued 12 May 2026 · expires 31 May 2027
Service, as the file records itTank Barge
Hull formbarge (Maury's inference from propulsion, hull shape, material and length, rule hf-1; not a recorded fact)
Tonnage as PSIX records it1619 - Simplified, Gross Ton 1619 - Simplified, Net Ton
Every line above is a field of the National Vessel Documentation Center's file as served by NOAA Fisheries, dated 10 August 2026, matched to this hull on its Official Number. Registered and ITC measurements are two systems and are never combined. One snapshot is held so far; documentation history begins with the next.
Vessel history report
Every record for this hull, in one document — $299
Every recorded inspection, 1972 to
2026 for this class, in one chronology · every deficiency, with system, dates
and resolution · operational controls imposed and removed · every name this
hull has been recorded under · the vessels it was inspected alongside, and when
· how its record compares with hulls of similar age and size, as a fact about the
population and never a judgement about this vessel.
This report is in development and is not for sale yet. There is
no date, and nothing is charged. Leave an email and we will tell you when it exists, once.
Used only to tell you when the report exists.
Not shared, not sold, and not added to a mailing list.
The Coast Guard recorded this vessel and the following in the same
inspection activity — normally a tug and the barges in its tow. A recreational or
unclassed hull in the same activity is held and not published, so it does not appear
here: these lists are a floor, not a complete manifest.
If during an internal structural examination, cargo tank internal examination, or underwater survey, damage or deterioration to the hull plating, structural members, or cargo tanks is discovered, the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, may require the vessel to be drydocked or otherwise taken out of service to further assess the extent of the damage and to effect permanent repairs.
During the COI exam, scattered deep pitting was observed on the cargo tank top. For the duration leading up to the next required internal structure exam, the vessel must conduct annual gauging of the deeply pitted areas to ensure that no further degradation of the existing plate occurs that may require repair. The results of this gauging must be provided to the company TBSIP USCG coordinator. If any deep pit exceeds allowable limits for structural wastage, a repair plan must be submitted to the USCG for further evaluation.
No extensive repairs to the hull or machinery which affect the safety of a vessel shall be made without the knowledge of the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection. The burden for proposing acceptable repairs rests upon the vessel owner. Owner failed to notify the USCG of the clad welding pit repairs that occurred on the forward tank top trunk facing the bow.
Action required: 10 - Deficiency Rectified
Resolved 20 November 2025
If, during an internal structural examination, cargo tank internal examination, or underwater survey, damage or deterioration to the hull plating, structural members, or cargo tanks is discovered, the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, may require the vessel to be drydocked or otherwise taken out of service to further assess the extent of the damage and to effect permanent repairs. During the COI exam, heavily pitted areas were observed on the forward area of the cargo tank top which were coated at the time of inspection. MIs requested a previous gauging report that was done prior to MI attendance on 12Oct25. Gauging report listed numerous heavily pitted areas of the tank top vertical plate facing the bow in excess of 50% wastage with less than 1/4" material remaining. Operator stated that clad welding was used to mitigate the affected areas which was not brought to the attention of the attending MI during the drydock, internal structural exam, and cargo tank internal exams. Operator must provide a scope of repairs for the areas that were clad welded to further evaluate total scope of work and adequacy of repair.
Action required: 701 - Prior to carriage of passengers/cargo
Resolved 20 November 2025
Resolution: Vessel provided a scope of repairs that were performed for the affected area to the satisfaction of the OCMI.
Prior to cargo discharge operations, emergency shut-down for cargo pump prime mover must be tested to satisfaction of attending Marine Inspector.
Condition: Invalid
Action required: 701 - Prior to carriage of passengers/cargo
Due 1 November 2016
Resolved 9 November 2016
Resolution: MI witnessed proper operation of pump prime mover emergency shutdown
Deck/Cargo › Vapor Control Systems › Liquid Overfill Protection
Issued 1 October 2011Resolved
The High level alarms were inoperable.
Action required: 705 - Other - as specified
Due 2 October 2011
Resolved 2 October 2011
Resolution: Received RIO tech report, cleared deficiency.
Make modification to cargo pump engine control panel to ensure compliance with 46 CFR 111.105-5 and 111.105-31(1).
Due 1 August 2008
Resolved 1 October 2011
Resolution: Cargo pump engine control panel in compliance with 46 CFR 111.105-31(l) and is outside 10 feet of hazardous locations.
12 April 2007Routine · role: Involved in a Marine Casualty · activity 2907293
8 May 2010Routine · role: Involved in a Marine Casualty · activity 3734857
3 November 2013Routine · role: Involved in a Marine Casualty · activity 4793515
6 January 2014Routine · role: Involved in a Marine Casualty · activity 4779710
29 December 2023Routine · role: Involved in a Marine Casualty · activity 7857418
Each line is an incident investigation the Coast Guard recorded with this hull among the vessels involved, with the date and the classification the Coast Guard gave it. Involvement is not fault. The investigation narrative is not published. Source: IIR, through 2026.
Recorded names · 1
FMT 3055 (2007–2023). Names as the Coast Guard recorded them in incident records, with the years they appear; some are renames and some are spelling variants.
Ownership record
The Coast Guard's documentation record for this hull -- the Abstract of Title,
with its owners and liens as filed -- is not in PSIX. Ask, and Maury buys it from the National
Vessel Documentation Center, files it here with its date, and every reader of this page gets it.